The government trumpeted plans to impose a 1.75 per cent levy on new developments of more than three dwellings to pay for building thousands of social and affordable homes from 2024
A contentious $800 million tax to build social housing has been dropped by the Victorian (Australia) government over fears of a ‘mischievous’ scare campaign on housing affordability in an election year.
Less than a fortnight ago, the Andrews government trumpeted plans to impose a 1.75 per cent levy on new developments of more than three dwellings to pay for building thousands of social and affordable homes from 2024.
It argued the tax would affect less than 30 per cent of residential planning permits and could raise more than $800 million annually to fund up to 1700 new social and affordable homes each year.
Key industry groups expressed concern the levy costs would be directly passed onto home buyers, despite the government claiming it had reached a deal for levy support alongside reforms to cut planning red tape and boost sector profits.
Following a meeting on Monday, Treasurer Tim Pallas confirmed the government would abandon the tax and adjoining planning reforms in parliament.
They are done, they are dusted, they are finished, he told reporters on Tuesday.
He attributed the about face to the industry’s ‘negative’ response and the spread of ‘misinformation’ as part of a ‘mischievous’ scare campaign.
They’ve sought to mislead and confuse the community into this being a net cost on housing, he said. It’s total nonsense and the government is not going to put up with the scare campaign of that nature.
The government has promised the reforms package and levy will not be revisited after the November state election, with Pallas conceding there was a ‘measure of concern’ internally that the ‘disinformation’ campaign would do damage the ballot box.
Property Council of Australia’s Victorian executive director Danni Hunter said the shelving of the reforms was ‘incredibly disappointing’ and rejected the sector had reneged on a pre-arranged deal.
The peak body would have accepted a ‘more reasonable’ levy of one per cent to 1.25 per cent, she said.
On Tuesday, Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) Victoria’s chief executive Matthew Kandelaars welcomed the decision to bin the levy but not its planning reforms.
It’s frustrating that the government has chosen to hold to ransom the improvement of inefficiencies within a state-sponsored planning system that would help to accelerate the Victorian economy out of the pandemic, Kandelaars said in a statement.
The articles are for information purposes only and Invest for Property shall not be held responsible for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies within it. Any rules or regulations mentioned within the website are those relevant at the time of publication and may not be the most up-to-date.
Invest for Property does not endorse any of the products or services that appear on it or are linked to it and are not liable for any action that you may take as a result of the content of this website, or losses or damage you may incur doing so.
There is no obligation to purchase anything but, if you decide to do so, you are strongly advised to consult a professional adviser before making any investment decisions.
Please remember that investments of any type may rise or fall and past performance does not guarantee future performance in respect of income or capital growth; you may not get back the amount you invested.
Credit: Source link
